Tm1 c level rule This only makes any difference if there is a C: level rule later in the rule. That natural value is still there hiding under the overlay c-level rule. You can feed from a consolidation (i. The only way to make sure this is zero-suppressed is to ensure all child elements have a I am using TM1 version 9. It is very easy to create “bad” applications that may solve specific business problems, The TM1 rules engine is extremely efficient, especially when using the skipcheck function to ensure the TM1 sparse consolidation algorithm -Most of data are stored, a few calculation rules getting data from another cube. 2 - Windows, IBM SR42600689864 @MODS - please move this to the Bugs sub-forum as I TM1 Forum. Here is a sample rule which will phase an annual budget across months based on the number of w You can try using it in a rule in the attribute cube to check this. The chapter includes basic information required to use TM1 rules, including: •Requirements for Then you just have a rule which says [ 'A', 'M1' ] = C: 0 ; This will set the consolidation level A to 0 for M1 while allowing a user to enter a value into M2 and have it consolidate. For example: Element String Measure Introduction to TM1 Rules 1-1 1 Introduction to TM1 Rules This chapter provides an introduction to TM1 cube rules, which enable you to derive cell values through calculations. Top. OLAP Product: TM1 Version: 9. Where no consolidation is required ergo no feeding is required. Best regards, Wim Gielis IBM Champion 2024-2025 Excel Most Valuable Professional, 2011-2014 https://www. 2 - Windows, IBM SR42600689864 @MODS - please move this to the Bugs sub-forum as I There are functions which MDX can deliver quite easily which TM1 rules either can't deliver unless you go back to 1st principles algebra (e. The Time_Day dimension has the days at n level and months at c level. kenship Regular Participant Posts: 194 Placing a C level rule below an N level rule interferes with the N level rules below that C level rule and can lead to data loss. com ==> 121 TM1 articles and a lot of custom code Newest blog article: Deleting elements quickly. I am trying to understand how TM1 query engine handles C level rules in relation to a query performance problem that I have with C level rules. 'AverageTimeCount)/ Count(case with average time >0) + N Level "Wk6" + N Level "Wk7" + N Level "Wk8" + N Level "Wk 9" + N Level "Feb Adj" In my Accounts dimension, I have : C Balance C Assets C Receivables N "Acct 1 - Rec. Kamil Arendt. Furthermore, depending on which consolidation path is optimal at any given moment, TM1 may alternate between paths. Total_Company), which is the same as writing individual feeders for each of the node level children of the consolidation you're feeding from. com ==> 121 TM1 articles and a lot of custom code Newest blog article: Deleting elements Was really looking for any suggestions on how to feed from a C level element to a leaf level element so that I could If the c level rule really is needed. I tend to create an "Input" element that rolls up into the consolidation. e. Hi, I have a problem of an instance RAM growing too much because of feeders. EvgenyT Community Contributor Posts: 324 Not allowing separate N and C rules means that when TM1 is scanning through the rule file (which it does every time you want to retrieve any numbers) and it finds a range that matches the cell value being requested (but not the type: N or C), it can stop scanning the rule file, knowing there cannot be more rules of different type assigned to I need a rule that is after calculating the average at the consolidation level need assign that value to N level elements. Often used in the Balance Sheet or Depreciation rules. Tom O'Kelley - Manager Finance Systems replace them with C-level rules and faux-feed via natural consolidations. Applying the rule to leaf level only and letting TM1’s optimised consolidation algorithm do the “adding up” is much more efficient in terms of processing and response time. [Averagetimecount]= C: (DB(!PersonResponsible , 'All Processor',!Months,'All cases'. ['Measure'] = C: ConsolidatedAvg(0, '', !Dim1, !Dim2, Etc); A TM1 rule without SKIPCHECK or FEEDERS will perform all calculations correctly but performance will be slower than if those parameters had been included. The STET command was added to prove the point Here we discuss how to do three rules, all that should be in your TM1 kitbag. Morning all, As for why your C: rule wasn't firing, I think that it is because you are not using separate N: and C: level rules, and as you were using more than one rule line to reference the same data area TM1 will expect the C: to be on the first line. Also, the N: side of your last line would never have fired as the first condition is Salary < 20000, so TM1 Forum. 1) db with bracketed reference to the multiple hierarchies works 2) CellValueN works if any reference to the dimension in question is omitted 3) CellValueN does not works if references to the dimension in question are included. 2 I have a simpe consolidation and want per C-Level Rule to set aome of them explicitly to 0 for Zero-Suppression even if Leafs are Nonzero. This both removes the need for a feeder from full revenue to h1 rpd and removes the requirement for the n level rule 2) we don't know how big the cube is but the cube dimensions may be in a Then your string measure has a C-level rule that says if the numeric is 0 then '0' otherwise '1'. jim wood Site Admin Posts: 3958 Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 1:51 pm OLAP Product: TM1 IE at any subtotal you would be viewing an average. 1. Common FEEDER mistakes Underfeeding FEEDERS Underfeeding occurs when some or all of the values that are being calculated are not fed. IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW. 2 and have AllowNandCrules (don't remember the exact syntax) in the config file. Those calculations This is a common requirement often seen in budgeting rules to allocate/phase/spread an annual budget across months based on Calendar Days, Working Days or Last Year’s Actual Values for the given account. adasko Posts: 13 Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 12:06 pm OLAP Product: Cognos Tm1 IBM TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW; ↳ Bugs; ↳ Enhancements; ↳ Commercial and Events; ↳ OLAP Jobs; ↳ Useful code, tips and tricks; So in summary, it's a C: level rule (Time based override for balance measures). 2 Excel Version: 2010 Overriding C: level elements with rules. If A is a consolidation then it will always show as grey, but if the entry is in the measures dimension that will show as white in combination with B and C. This is possible because You have a rule at C level, which overrides the default aggregation algorithm in TM1. 2 C level rule, if statements and elisanc. standard deviation) or where it simply isn't worth writing a separate rule for or for things like min/max/count/average where the relevance of the analysis is on the current set and level of the members -Most of data are stored, a few calculation rules getting data from another cube. Is it easier to use the old methodology to take care of this? Just make a counter measure and write a C: level rule for the measure to be Measure/Count? My current rule is exactly what you would see in the reference guid. Write your rule at the C level C=C:A*B Design your cube so that for any given rule you only need to involve one dimension, this is key as it limits the use of ConsolidateChildren to just the single dimension. However the days per month needs to be dynamic rather than a hard coded "31". TM1 is great at consolidating data, but what if you want to prevent that from happening? Consider the following example, where we have FTE data for an employee at the Month level that is being incorrectly consolidated at the Make A a child of C, this feeds C a "consolidation feeder" rather than rule feeder. Feeders are a crucial part of IBM TM1/Planning Analytics, giving us ad-hoc rule calculations without loss of performance or requiring pre-calculations of results. The eight days of training we had for TM1 left a lot to be desired, and I find the documentation poor (this is just my experience, others experience may be different). C level rule not working properly. You should avoid writing a rule that overrides a consolidated value that is a component of another consolidation. working on TM1 10. g. " And Outside of the main balance hierachie C Total Balancing Acct N "Acct 1" In my rules/feeders, I would really question a TM1 design that has so much in rule driven calculations that it takes 24 hours to process feeders. 19 posts • Page 1 of 1. N elements to come up with the consolidated value and ignores anything on the intermediate C levels, whether they are rule-calculated or not. 0 Clients Guide "Overriding C: level elements with rules"): "You have no control over the order in which TM1 performs dimension consolidations. Morning all, The Drill Through rule assignment is set for the leaf level: [] = S:IF( (ISLEAF = 1), 'fullbutest_reportingQA', ''); -> where fullbutest_reportingQA is the Drill Through process However because TM1's security GUI is so mindbogglingly slow and awful most experienced admins and developers will opt for direct edit followed by security refresh. Skip to content. Full transparency, I am an FP&A guy with limited rule/feeder writing experience. 000000001. kelleher » Thu Aug 19, 2010 7:59 am. In order to show a C-level string element have some resemblance to the n-level strings below it you will need to write specific rule telling TM1 what it should see. //www. The results are correct as per the rule so it works. If you want the rule to apply at the C level on the time dimension but N level on other dimensions you can't use =C: in the rule, that limits the rule to C level elements across Specifying Different Rules at the N: and C: Levels It is often necessary to differentiate the way C: level and N: level cells within an area are treated. Morning all, TM1 Forum. " C Liabilities C Payables N "Acct 1 - Pay. 2 - Windows, IBM SR42600689864 @MODS - please move this to the Bugs sub-forum as I Placing a C level rule below an N level rule interferes with the N level rules below that C level rule and can lead to data loss. I have the rule working fine for N level data, but figures are consolidating when I look at Total Company. 0 and it didn't seem to work. To calculate the grand total (Total, 1 Quarter), TM1® can consolidate the product totals for each month or consolidate quarterly totals for each product. Morning all, -Most of data are stored, a few calculation rules getting data from another cube. Opening (Measure) is equal to the Closing of the prior period. Quick links. I am trying to write a rule to calculate % achievement of plan (and growth over prior year). -About 10 ratios and indexes calculations. Averaging Rule (C Level) – e. https://www. I've never seen a C level on the LHS of a rule statement used to refer to all the N levels below it before. Feed C level rules. C level rules therefore by definition never require feeding since if any feeding is to be done it is at leaf level. Morning all,. Post by dan. so for n level i load via ti , but for consolidation i have to use the rule . Bypassing Rules By using the STET Rolling Value Rule – e. I _think_ this is key. Any help is appreciated. At the C/Month level of the dimension this attribute is populated with the days of the month. -About 10 ratios and indexes calculations. kelleher wrote:You don't necessarily need to write your rule using a DB function as it's not an inter-cube rule and you're not using any functions within the DB. If you stet a C: cell then all that happens is that it naturally consolidates as normal. Placing a C level rule below an N level rule interferes with the N level rules below that C level rule and can lead to data loss. TM1 Forum. ['Group Average']=C:['Kgs']\['Metres']; say this is 10 ['Group Average']=N:[ Value 10 should be assigned here] regards, abi dan. Catherine Posts: 110 Feed C level rules. At least prior TM1 releases were very clear on that topic (copy of 9. Then consider some of these options 1) Make full revenue a child of h1 rpd with a weighting of 0. bunkersoldier Posts: 5 Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 12:18 pm OLAP Product: TM1 Version: 10. That's the way I'd go about it. Say Group average=10 and also I want that 10 to beassigned to leaf level elements for group average. Declan Rodger. Simple calculation (Actual \ Budget). Can anyone help me with the rule here . Actually exchange rates are a textbook example of where you can use C level rules to very good effect and eliminate the requirement for feeders AND achieve good performance. TM1 Version 10. 5. However, getting feeders right takes a good understanding of the TM1 Forum. The dimension has an attribute called "Days per month". 2. Discussing all things TM1, Planning Analytics, PAx and PAW. FAQ; Board index. Cube-Viewer Shows me that the Elements are set correctly but Zero-Supreession does not work. Michel Hi everyone. -Most of data are stored, a few calculation rules getting data from another cube. 4 Excel Version: 11 Location: London. Consequently Average will always make sense at all levels, whereas Input will only make sense at A C-level rule is nothing more than an overlay to natural value (consolidation). A way to get around this is to have a dummy (N: level) element underneath the C: level element and use this for storing and feeding the calculation on the C: level (giving this dummy element weight 1 in the consolidation and the other elements weight 0) - the C: level element will receive the value through the normal consolidation mechanism. It over-rides this and reverts the consolidation back to being a plain old consolidation. Even with Zero-Supression the cells are shown!? Best regards -Most of data are stored, a few calculation rules getting data from another cube. These include Allocation/Phase Rule, Rolling Value Rule and Averaging Rule (C Level). wimgielis. My problem is I'm trying to write a C and a N rule and then consolidated the two together. Kenneth. Morning all, I tested feeders on detail level and it works but once changing the rule to calculate on C: level it won't. bplaia Posts: 23 Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2013 5:10 pm OLAP Product: TM1 Version: 9. They are ratios so my rules do not have neither N: nor C: The calculation works perfectly well, but my users want to be able to use suppress zero functionality. Those calculations are the source of my problem. In a few words: -My main cube has 14 dimensions. 2 - Windows, IBM SR42600689864 @MODS - please move this to the Bugs sub-forum as I -Most of data are stored, a few calculation rules getting data from another cube. The system will look at the FEEDERS of In general, FEEDERS are not required for C level rules. My rule in the target cube is populating leaf elements with values from a consolidated element in my source cube. I tested it briefly in 9. level of flexibility can also have some undesirable side effects if projects are not developed or managed well. Averaging Percentages or Rates up all TM1 is great at consolidating data, but what if you want to prevent that from happening? Consider the following example, where we have FTE data for an employee at the Month level that is being incorrectly consolidated at the Placing a C level rule below an N level rule interferes with the N level rules below that C level rule and can lead to data loss. . Feeders are an exclusively LEAF LEVEL concept. They exist for one purpose only: to enable consolidation of rule calculated leaf cells. The Average at the N level will be the same as the Input, as Input/1=Input and the rule has been set to apply to both N and C levels. Post by jim wood » Mon Jan 30, 2012 4:19 pm. Code: https://www. The IBM Cognos TM1 Developer can optionally choose to define C: level cells are automatically fed if their N: level children have FEEDERS defined. This means that a numeric attribute value can be held against a consolidated item of the corresponding dimension. The only exception is when a rule is applied to a consolidated element where it does not have values in any of its child elements. baspojkaclydzqrvssayypfhqjoleohlleeandowihyopevyzsxbhpguqyfuxfnshwuuqxoclwqhhcxkqazbrw